In reply to @advesperacit "<@180601887916163073> that's understandable. I": I
entirely and fully agree with you there, but that also means you need to have
somebody reviewing those PRs that pays attention to that because it's a given
that this will happen, sooner or later a contributor will forget or just be new
and not know.
Then you need somebody who plays vigil and makes sure they know all the rules
and makes sure they're being upheld.
But who is your QC-person on that beyond just the general "Code seems like it
works"?