### Transgender Ideology: An Analysis and Call for Prosecutions #### Introduction The concept of transgenderism represents a profound challenge to biological reality and societal norms. At its core, it asserts that individuals can change their sex, a notion that is biologically impossible and ideologically driven. This document outlines the fundamental truths about sex and gender, exposes the drivers behind this ideology, highlights its harmful consequences, and calls for accountability. While some may dismiss these concerns as peripheral, the evidence demonstrates systemic harms to children, women, and institutions, demanding urgent attention and reform. #### The Immutability of Sex People cannot change sex. Sex is binary, immutable, and rooted in biology, determined by DNA in every cell of the body. Hormones circulating in an unborn child's brain and body shape their development along male or female lines. Neither hormone treatment nor surgery can alter this fundamental reality. For instance, Dr Georges Burou, a French gynaecologist (1910-1987), established a clinic in Casablanca, Morocco, from the mid-1950s, performing hundreds of procedures on adult men to approximate female anatomy with minimal psychological evaluation. Burou himself admitted, “I don't change men into women. I transform male genitals into genitals that have a female aspect. All the rest is in the patient's mind.” Such interventions are cosmetic modifications that fail to transform chromosomal structure, gamete production, or reproductive biology. Australian resident Alan Finch, who underwent genital surgery in his 20s after deciding at age 19 to transition from male to female, later described it as “genital mutilation”. At age 36, he told *The Guardian* in 2004: “transsexualism was invented by psychiatrists… You fundamentally can’t change sex … the surgery doesn’t alter you genetically. It’s genital mutilation. My ‘vagina’ was just the bag of my scrotum. It’s like a pouch, like a kangaroo. What’s scary is you still feel like you have a penis when you’re sexually aroused. It’s like phantom limb syndrome. It’s all been a terrible misadventure. I’ve never been a woman, just Alan … the analogy I use about giving surgery to someone desperate to change sex is it’s a bit like offering liposuction to an anorexic”. Sex change operations are illusory: even psychiatrists and surgeons who have served so-called “transsexual” clients acknowledge that surgery does not change sex. These anecdotes, and men's fetish for being butchered in pursuit of their sexual fantasies more widely, do not undermine the fundamental biological truth that humans cannot change sex. In blunter terms, a man who develops a sexual fetish for cross-dressing (**please read about [autogynephilia](https://www.google.com/search?q=autogynephilia), which is horrifying** )and pays for surgery to complete the fantasy in order to achieve sexual self-gratification, does not become a woman. See: * Google search for [autogynephilia](https://www.google.com/search?q=autogynephilia), which is horrifying. * *FamilyVoice Australia, Submission on ‘Conversion’ Practices to the Tasmania Law Reform Institute* (17 December 2020) [https://web.archive.org/web/20230327000907/https://www.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/1425585/007_Family-Voice-Australia.pdf](https://web.archive.org/web/20230327000907/https://www.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/1425585/007_Family-Voice-Australia.pdf) * *Peter Sprigg, “Understanding and Responding to the Transgender Movement”,* Family Research Council, 16 June 2015, [https://www.frc.org/transgender](https://www.frc.org/transgender) * David Batty, “Mistaken identity”, *The Guardian*, 31 July 2004, [http://www.theguardian.com/society/2004/jul/31/health.socialcare](http://www.theguardian.com/society/2004/jul/31/health.socialcare) #### Rejection of Transgender Concepts. There is no such thing as "trans". The concept of "gender" as distinct from biological sex is a recent and unscientific ideological construct, thoroughly dismantled in works such as Helen Joyce’s *[Trans: When Ideology Meets Reality](https://www.amazon.co.uk/Trans-When-Ideology-Meets-Reality/dp/0861543726)*, Abigail Shrier’s *[Irreversible Damage](https://www.amazon.co.uk/Irreversible-Damage-Transgender-Seducing-Daughters/dp/180075034X)*, and Kathleen Stock’s *[Material Girls](https://www.amazon.co.uk/Material-Girls-Why-Reality-Matters/dp/0349726620)*. While sex is binary and immutable, "gender" is an incoherent and harmful sociopolitical fiction. #### Drivers Behind Gender Ideology. This fiction is propelled by several insidious factors, each contributing to its propagation and harms: 1. **Adult men's paraphilia, autogynephilia, or cross-dressing sexual fetishes** (e.g., Andrea Chu, Torrey Peters, Grace Lavery, Aimee Challenor). 2. **Systemic online grooming of children**, creating a veneer of legitimacy for the above, presenting as mental health issues in the form of social contagion or ‘Rapid Onset of Gender Dysphoria’ (ROGD) in trans-identifying girls. 3. **A rapaciously profit-seeking American medical industry**, eager to earn profits from castrating and mastectomising children. 4. **Opportunism by male sports cheats** (e.g., Rachel McKinnon, Alana McLaughlin). 5. Sex offenders seeking access to their next victims (e.g., Karen White, Barbie Kardashian, Darren Merager). 6. **Credulous and lobotomised Democrats** and Labour supporters, desperate to valorise the next self-declared victim group to display their purported moral superiority. These drivers underscore how ideology prioritises fantasy over biology, leading to profound societal damage. #### Societal Harms Ideologues are grooming, drugging, chemically sterilising, and surgically mutilating children; women’s sports are being destroyed; and women are being exposed to sexual assault and rape in saunas, changing rooms, toilets, rape crisis centres, hospitals, and prisons. This matters because of the profound societal harms affecting children, women, and fair institutions. Dismissing them ignores the evidence from experts. Even low surgery rates belie the harm: thousands of cases involve irreversible sterilisation and regret, as noted in the [Cass Review](https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/), which highlights weak or no evidence for benefits. The $2 billion industry, with reports of 5,700 minors operated on between 2019 and 2023, profits from unproven interventions. In sports, over 578 male "victories" in women's events displace female competitors, eroding equity rooted in biological differences. Safety incidents, such as assaults by Karen White in prisons or Darren Merager in spas, stem from self-identification policies that heighten risks. Private fetishes become public concerns when autogynephilic men demand access to women's spaces, eroding privacy and safety. [Reduxx](https://reduxx.info/) documents many intrusions, including Darren Merager's serial exposures in women's spas. Evidence of grooming and contagion is substantial: Shrier's *Irreversible Damage* details ROGD in girls, with 1,655 parental reports in the *Archives of Sexual Behaviour* (2023). [Transgender Trend](https://www.transgendertrend.com/) highlights schools affirming identities without scrutiny. Comparative offender rates miss the point: specific policies enable predators. This mindset permeates policy, with Democrats and Labour valorising trans fetishists while ignoring women's concerns. It endangers women, harms children via medical experimentation, and destroys truth. #### Critiques of So-Called “Gender-Affirming Care” - i.e. Drugging and Mutilating Children Recent developments further expose the flaws in so-called gender-affirming care. For instance, in the Supreme Court oral arguments for *U.S. v. Skrmetti* (as detailed in Tyler O'Neil's X thread: [https://x.com/tyler2oneil/status/1864481717299433915](https://x.com/tyler2oneil/status/1864481717299433915)), advocates made at least six false or dubious claims. U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar falsely claimed puberty blockers are fully reversible and merely "press pause" on natural growth, ignoring serious side effects and disagreements among hormone doctors. ACLU lawyer Chase Strangio, another transvestite, asserted that such care reduces depression, anxiety, and suicidality, yet a pro-trans FDA official admitted a study showed puberty blockers increased suicidal thoughts. Prelogar argued that natural puberty is harmful for some minors, flipping biology on its head by preferring artificial hormone-induced changes. Justices like Sonia Sotomayor erroneously equated treatments for precocious puberty with those for gender dysphoria, a comparison debunked by Tennessee Attorney General Matt Rice. Elena Kagan suggested the Tennessee law enforces gender conformity, but Rice clarified it protects minors from harm by encouraging acceptance of biological reality. Ketanji Brown Jackson repeatedly compared bans on transgender interventions to interracial marriage prohibitions, a claim Rice refuted by noting the fundamental differences in medical treatments. Complementing this, Corinna Cohn's Substack article "On the Moderate Transsexual Question" ([https://corinnacohn.substack.com/p/on-the-moderate-transsexual-question](https://corinnacohn.substack.com/p/on-the-moderate-transsexual-question)) critiques the illusion of moderation in transgender advocacy. Cohn, who underwent sex reassignment surgery at 19 in 1994, argues that figures like Brianna Wu, who claim moderation, actually defend activist positions. Wu supports gender-affirming care for minors, including puberty blockers for boys to avoid "bodily destruction," and opposes secret school transitions but allows parental decisions. Cohn proposes a true moderate stance: no child transitions, ban all sex-trait surgery on minors, focus on therapy. On sports, Wu acknowledges male advantages but deems female-exclusive categories bigoted; Cohn insists trans women (males) should not participate in women's sports. For spaces, Wu allows post-surgery access; Cohn advocates third spaces to protect women's privacy. Cohn concludes that genuine moderation requires protecting women's rights and halting extreme demands, exposing how "moderate" labels mask ideological alignment. In medicine, even limited cases in the thousands incur sterility and regret, as critiqued in the Cass Review and HHS guidance favouring psychotherapy over medicalisation. A one-study documented cross-dressing "athletes" securing nearly 900 medals in women's events, displacing competitors. #### Addressing Counterarguments and Apathy I understand why many people do not care: these issues may seem peripheral based on personal encounters, and personal experience shapes perceptions. However, public policy must address systemic harms beyond anecdotes, safeguarding vulnerable populations and upholding safety, fairness, and evidence-based medicine. Rejecting the assertion that conservative hatred causes harm, we simply outright reject these assertions and delusions. If a man wishes to engage in cross-dressing, that is his problem; we should not indulge his fetish. Allegations of hatred and violence are largely fabricated; in the case of cross-dressers, they often involve unlawful activities like prostitution, Class A drug use, or psychosis. In an earlier era, they would have been institutionalised. This affects us all, challenging core truths about sex and setting precedents for policy divorced from science. Historical conservative or religious abuses warrant scrutiny but do not justify ignoring these harms; they are distractors. Not generalisations: the examples reflect broader unfairness. Please prioritise evidence over apathy: read the cited works for clarity. If these resonate little with your experiences, what specific harms do you consider worthy of policy focus? Reading Joyce or Stock could provide insight before asserting none matters. #### Analogies to Illustrate Absurdity I reject the concept of transgender people, giving it as much respect as if I declared myself a trans-zebra, demanding to be housed with zebras at London Zoo. I reject their existence, just as I reject leprechauns, fairies, angels, poltergeists, witches, demons, and trans-zebras. When my children pretended to be a walrus as toddlers, I told them: * It is enjoyable to pretend to be a walrus. * That is a very imaginative game. * Let us play together. * Can you show me how a walrus moves? * Playing make-believe is one of the most interesting things we can do. * It is fun to think about what it is like to be an animal. * When our game is finished, and even while we are playing it, you are still my child. * You are a real person, and I am your parent. * That fact always stays the same, no matter what we pretend. Those last three lines are crucial: facts always stays the same, no matter what we pretend. That includes, for adult men, not indulging their sexual fetishes; for groomed children, not pretending they are the opposite sex, zebras, or walruses. They are real people, even if we do not share their delusions. Matt Walsh's children's book *[Johnny the Walrus](https://www.amazon.co.uk/Johnny-Walrus-Matt-Walsh/dp/1956007059)* satirises this: Johnny pretends to be various things, but when he declares himself a walrus, his mother, influenced by online ideologues, seeks medical affirmation, leading to irreversible modifications like attaching tusks and prescribing walrus hormones. This mirrors trans ideology's promotion of grooming and medicalisation through social contagion and ROGD, driven by fetishes, profit-seeking industries, and liberals. Walsh's documentary *What is a Woman?* (2022) exposes the incoherence by asking activists, professionals, and academics to define "woman," revealing circular responses rooted in feelings rather than biology. Through interviews with detransitioners and experts, it underscores destruction of women's sports, invasion of spaces leading to assaults, and child exploitation, challenging political support for moral posturing. #### Recommendations for Further Reading I recommend reading Abigail Shrier, Dr Emma Hilton, Helen Joyce, Julie Bindel, J.K. Rowling, Kathleen Stock, Martina Navratilova, Maya Forstater, Kellie Jay Keen, and Michael Biggs, along with these websites: - [https://www.google.com/search?q=autogynephilia](https://www.google.com/search?q=autogynephilia) - [https://www.womensrights.network/](https://www.womensrights.network/) - [https://reduxx.info/](https://reduxx.info/) - [https://www.transgendertrend.com/](https://www.transgendertrend.com/) - [https://sex-matters.org/](https://sex-matters.org/) - [https://fairplayforwomen.com/](https://fairplayforwomen.com/) - [https://www.ft.com/content/8ccb051e-6637-4bc3-991a-5c768df03dd5?commentID=25f03ad0-411e-49a7-8d71-c4b54e7f3e50](https://www.ft.com/content/8ccb051e-6637-4bc3-991a-5c768df03dd5?commentID=25f03ad0-411e-49a7-8d71-c4b54e7f3e50) I also recommend the video: [https://youtu.be/xSRfnpEl17w](https://youtu.be/xSRfnpEl17w), where Matt Walsh denounces transgender ideology as a perilous, delusional framework driving violence, such as a trans-identifying shooter's attack on a Catholic school. Media hides transgender crimes, like Jared Ravizza’s stabbings. Walsh catalogues acts including mass shootings in Maryland, Colorado, Colorado Springs, Philadelphia, Nashville, and a parental slaying, noting per capita data positions this group as most likely to commit deadly mass shootings. The ideology empowers psychopaths via unnatural hormones and fantasy affirmation. He criticises leftist policies for intensifying delusions and anti-Christian animus, with Democrats inciting terrorism. Walsh demands prohibiting affirmation, reclassifying transgenderism as a grave mental disorder, barring firearm sales to affected individuals, and obliterating this demonic agenda. #### Accountability and Prosecution What follows will sound extreme, but (a) it has precedent; and (b) it is necessary for both punishment and deterrence. Doctors and Democrats responsible for transgender ideology should face prosecution, conviction, and execution. Doctors who administered puberty blockers for chemical sterilisation and performed surgical mutilations on children, along with enabling politicians, journalists, and teachers, must face severe punishment as a deterrent. Unlike the well-intentioned thalidomide error, this was ideologically driven for political gain, paralleling Imperial Japanese Army Unit 731's experiments ([https://www.pacificatrocities.org/human-experimentation.html](https://www.pacificatrocities.org/human-experimentation.html)) and Josef Mengele's Nazi atrocities. Trump should enforce civil and criminal liability on doctors and Democrats facilitating child trans surgeries. The US death penalty has precedent: The Nuremberg Trials established forced sterilisation as a crime against humanity under Article 6(c) of the Nuremberg Charter ([https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/nuremberg-tribunal-charter-1945/article-6b](https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/nuremberg-tribunal-charter-1945/article-6b)), influencing the Geneva Conventions ([https://www.icrc.org/en/law-and-policy/geneva-conventions-and-their-commentaries](https://www.icrc.org/en/law-and-policy/geneva-conventions-and-their-commentaries)) and ICC Rome Statute's Article 7 ([https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/2024-05/Rome-Statute-eng.pdf](https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/2024-05/Rome-Statute-eng.pdf)). Rectification could involve Trump legislating two tribunals, 75 years apart: First, immediate "Non-Article 3" tribunals (no juries, akin to courts martial) for "Trans Ideology Trials," prosecuting and executing key figures, e.g., thousands of ringleaders. Second, a future Truth and Reconciliation Commission to review actions and trials, pre-legislating its finding: Trans activists deserved execution, the executions were regrettable but understandable, with retrospective exoneration. This should also be applied in other countries stricken by trans ideology. You remain determined to prioritise deviant men's sexual fetishes over women, children, and society: see the listed websites. We disagree; the fight is at the ballot box. That is why the USA has Trump, and the UK is on track for Reform. #### Conclusion. Transgender ideology represents a dangerous delusion that harms the most vulnerable while undermining biological truth. By prioritising evidence from experts and rejecting ideological fiction, society can protect children from mutilation, women from invasion, and institutions from destruction. Prosecutions must follow to deter future atrocities, ensuring a return to sanity grounded in immutable facts.